Honorary Doctorates: Time to End the Tradition?
The practice of awarding honorary doctorates is under scrutiny. Karti P. Chidambaram, a prominent voice, argues it must stop. He insists recipients should not use the “Dr.” prefix. This debate is gaining global attention.
Honorary doctorates are often given to recognize achievements. Universities award them to notable figures in arts, politics, or philanthropy. However, critics say they blur academic credibility. Earned doctorates require years of rigorous study. Honorary ones do not.
Chidambaram’s stance is clear. The “Dr.” title should be reserved for academic scholars. Allowing its use by honorary recipients confuses the public. It risks devaluing true academic accomplishment.
The tradition spans centuries. Prestigious institutions like Oxford and Harvard partake. Yet, the criticism grows louder. Some argue it’s a harmless honor. Others see it as misleading.
Globally, opinions vary. In the U.S., honorary doctorates are common but rarely carry the “Dr.” title in formal settings. In India, the practice is widespread, with politicians and celebrities often addressed as “Dr.” Critics like Chidambaram want reform.
What’s the solution? Chidambaram urges universities to halt the practice. He also calls on recipients to drop the prefix voluntarily. This, he believes, restores clarity and respect for earned titles.
The debate is far from over. Will institutions listen? Will honorees comply? Only time will tell. For now, the call to rethink honorary doctorates grows louder.
